Why STEM Gets Its Own Guidance
Every National Interest Waiver (NIW) petition is decided under the three-prong Matter of Dhanasar test. But USCIS's Policy Manual includes a section on specific evidentiary considerations for people with advanced degrees in science, technology, engineering, or mathematics (STEM) (6 USCIS-PM F.5). USCIS states that it "recognizes the importance of progress in STEM fields and the essential role of persons with advanced STEM degrees," especially in critical and emerging technologies or other STEM areas important to U.S. competitiveness or national security.
The analysis is the same as for any NIW, and the Policy Manual notes these considerations can apply to non-STEM endeavors where relevant. What the section does is explain how certain evidence is weighed. For the basics, see our guide to NIW and the Dhanasar test. The petitioner must also first qualify for EB-2; see qualifying for EB-2.
Critical and Emerging Technologies
To identify a critical and emerging technology field, officers consider "governmental, academic, and other authoritative and instructive sources," along with the petitioner's evidence. A STEM area may be important to competitiveness or security when the evidence shows the endeavor will help the United States stay ahead of strategic competitors or adversaries, or relates to a field, including research and development-intensive industries, where investment may help the United States achieve or keep technology leadership.
Prong 1: Substantial Merit and National Importance
The Policy Manual observes that "many proposed endeavors that aim to advance STEM technologies and research, whether in academic or industry settings," have both substantial merit and "sufficiently broad potential implications to demonstrate national importance."
It gives a contrasting example: classroom teaching in STEM may have substantial merit for U.S. educational interests, but teaching activities by themselves generally are not indicative of a broader impact on STEM education and so generally would not establish national importance.
Prong 2: Well Positioned to Advance the Endeavor
- An advanced STEM degree, especially a Ph.D., in a field tied to the endeavor and related to a critical and emerging technology or other important STEM area is "an especially positive factor."
- Specialized knowledge counts. Doctoral dissertations and some master's theses concentrate on a narrow subject, so officers consider whether that specific area relates to the proposed endeavor. Even a theoretical area, such as theoretical mathematics or physics, may further U.S. competitiveness or national security.
- But a degree is not enough. "A degree in and of itself, however, is not a sufficient basis to determine that a person is well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor." Supporting evidence, such as the person's track record, plans, and letters, still matters.
Prong 3: The Balance of Factors
The petitioner bears the burden of showing that the factors favoring a waiver outweigh those supporting a job offer and labor certification. For STEM petitions, USCIS considers this combination "a strong positive factor":
- The person has an advanced STEM degree, especially a Ph.D.;
- The person will work on a critical and emerging technology or other STEM area important to U.S. competitiveness; and
- The person is well positioned to advance the proposed STEM endeavor of national importance.
The benefit is "especially weighty" where the endeavor could support U.S. national security or economic competitiveness, or where the petition is supported by letters from interested U.S. government agencies.
Letters From Government Agencies
Letters from interested government agencies or quasi-governmental entities, such as federally funded research and development centers, are not required, but depending on their content they can help with all three prongs (6 USCIS-PM F.5):
- Prong 1: showing the agency has expertise in the endeavor and that it promises to advance a critical and emerging technology or is otherwise important to U.S. technological prominence
- Prong 2: detailed information about how well positioned the person is to advance the endeavor
- Prong 3: explaining a particular urgency, or how the United States would benefit from the person's contributions even if U.S. workers are available
Other Evidence That Often Matters
The STEM section supplements, rather than replaces, the usual NIW evidence. Depending on the case, that can include publications and citations, grants and funding, patents, the adoption or use of the person's work, and detailed letters from experts who can explain the work's significance. See our guides to recommendation letters and, for an entrepreneurial path, the NIW for entrepreneurs and founders.
NIW or EB-1A?
Many STEM researchers also consider EB-1A or, with an employer, EB-1B for outstanding researchers. See our guides to EB-1A or NIW and EB-1B. Researchers employed at universities and research organizations may also be eligible for cap-exempt H-1Bs while a green card case is pending.
Planning Points Drawn From the Guidance
None of these points guarantees an outcome, but each tracks the guidance described above:
- Define the endeavor specifically and connect it to a critical and emerging technology or other important STEM area, using authoritative sources.
- Link your degree and research focus to the endeavor, and back it with evidence beyond the degree itself.
- Explain national importance beyond the classroom if your work includes teaching.
- Consider whether a government or quasi-governmental entity familiar with your work could provide a detailed letter.
- Address the third prong explicitly, rather than assuming the first two carry it.
Key Takeaways
- USCIS's Policy Manual gives specific weight to advanced STEM degrees and critical and emerging technologies in NIW cases.
- Many STEM research endeavors can show national importance; teaching alone generally does not.
- A Ph.D. tied to the endeavor is "an especially positive factor," but a degree alone is not enough.
- An advanced STEM degree, work in an important STEM area, and being well positioned together form "a strong positive factor" on the third prong.
- Letters from interested government agencies are optional but can help with all three prongs.
Are you a researcher considering an NIW? Schedule a consultation to review your endeavor and evidence.
Sources and References
- USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 5: Advanced Degree or Exceptional Ability
- Matter of Dhanasar, 26 I&N Dec. 884 (AAO 2016)
- 8 CFR 204.5: EB-2 eligibility, paragraph (k)
This document provides general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Immigration law is complex and individualized. Outcomes depend on specific facts and circumstances. No results are guaranteed. Always consult with a qualified immigration attorney before making decisions about your immigration case.
About Kevin J Andrews
Kevin J Andrews is a business immigration attorney with 15+ years of experience specializing in EB-1A, O-1A, NIW, and L-1 petitions. He is the founder of Kevin J Andrews Law.